pfsockopen

(PHP 4, PHP 5, PHP 7, PHP 8)

pfsockopen — 打开一个持久的网络连接或者Unix套接字连接。

说明

pfsockopen ( string $hostname , int $port = -1 , int &$errno = ? , string &$errstr = ? , float $timeout = ini_get("default_socket_timeout") ) : resource

这个函数的作用与fsockopen()完全一样的，不同的地方在于当在脚本执行完后，连接一直不会关闭。可以说它是fsockopen()的长连接版本。

参数

对于其参数的信息，请参考fsockopen()的文档。

参见

fsockopen() - 打开一个网络连接或者一个Unix套接字连接

User Contributed Notes

zuraw 06-Jun-2012 12:17


pfsockopen() works great on IIS/Windows7 installation, it keeps connection open which is good for performance. However, there is one caveat: when connection is broken because of physical net failure, pfsockopen() returns handle as if connection was working. Subsequent call to fwrite() returns false so you have information about error. The problem is that after physical net connection is restored the situation doesn't change: pfsockopen() still returns handle and fwrite() returns false. In other words, PHP sticks to old connection that is not working (if you use fsockopen() instead, it will connect properly). Situation goes back to normal after 30 minutes when PHP closes unused connection.

The solution to this problem is to call fclose() on socket handle when fwrite() returns false.

k dot andris at gmail dot com 11-Dec-2008 10:22


To see if it's really a new connection, or a reused one, you can use ftell() - and see if ther's been any traffic on the connection. If it's more than 0, then it's a reused connection.

ludvig dot ericson at gmail dot com 27-Jul-2007 07:38


Confusion arises as to when PHP starts a new connection using all the

"persistent" versions of any function, and this depends entirely on how you

run your PHP.



In real CGI mode, that is, one process per script, persistent functions do the

exact same as their "temporary" equivalents. If you have a threaded Apache

MPM, this persistence will open a connection per thread, but not immediately.

Think of it as a single PHP instance for each thread.



If you run prefork, the MPM that forks the Apache server into several

accept()ing subprocesses, you'll have one PHP instance per process.



This isn't always true as I might've missed some gotchas, but in general, do

know that a persistent can only try to be persistent.



As for grey at greywyvern dot moc: A cronjob would be a lot better suited

for this, and have it periodically update the index rather than request ~200

pages each time somebody searches, at least from what you describe it as.

bimal dot das at maxartists dot com 07-Jun-2006 11:22


Here is how to POST a form action to a SSL server's cgi and retrieve output with pfsockopen





<?php





$host = gethostbyaddr($_SERVER['REMOTE_ADDR']);





# working vars


$host = 'www.example.com';


$service_uri = '/cgi-bin/processACT';


$vars ='code=22&act=TEST';





# compose HTTP request header


$header = "Host: $host\r\n";


$header .= "User-Agent: PHP Script\r\n";


$header .= "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\r\n";


$header .= "Content-Length: ".strlen($vars)."\r\n";


$header .= "Connection: close\r\n\r\n";





$fp = pfsockopen("ssl://".$host, 443, $errno, $errstr);


if (!$fp) {


   echo "$errstr ($errno)<br/>\n";


   echo $fp;


} else {


    fputs($fp, "POST $service_uri  HTTP/1.1\r\n");


    fputs($fp, $header.$vars);


    fwrite($fp, $out);


    while (!feof($fp)) {


        echo fgets($fp, 128);


    }


    fclose($fp);


}





?>

pulstar at ig dot com dot br 23-Sep-2003 04:15


Persistent connections either in socket or databases should be used only in servers where the limits are well defined. For example, the number of allowed connections in a database must be greater than the number of Apache's processes, or the connections will be refused by the database (this will surely occur if you use persistent connections). The same may occur with socket connections. This is up to the service configuration. In my opinion, persistent connections are useful only if you have total control over the one or more servers involved, like on a heavy loaded dedicated server for example, where the little gain in performance worth the use of such connections. Never use them in a shared server.

php dot net at domainofdarkness dot com 29-Jan-2001 03:26


OK, WRT to the p* functions opening a new connection when one already exists. It is my understanting that (under Apache anyways) this is on a per-process basis. If you do a 'ps auxw|grep httpd' on your server you will see more than one process. What p* does is make a p-connection on one of those processes only, the one that actually handles your request. Chances are that when you hit the page again it will be answered by a different process. I'm guessing if you keep hitting reload you'll get around to the original process again and there will be no error message or second connection open. Anyhow, this is true of all p* functions; they open not one connection per server, but one connection per server _process_.